Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:01

Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How Dragonfly will support the search for life on an uninhabitable world - NASASpaceFlight.com -
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Does Donald Trump have low self-esteem?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Does pressing a girls boobs hurt?
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
The #1 Underrated Vegetable with More Vitamin C Than an Orange, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Anthony says 1st HR made better by Red Sox win - ESPN
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Does Rosemary aroma really improve memory? Here’s what research says - Times of India
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
4 'Healthy' Trends That Need to Stop Now, According to a Dietitian - EatingWell